Hydrocarbons &amp; heavy metals induce bio-catalyst to modify development process in seeds, seedlings, and plants

ABSTRACT

The present invention is directed to methods of modifying the plant development process comprising of exposing a seed, seedling, or plant to volatiles biosynthesized by one or more bacteria or enzymes. Specifically, the embodiment uses one or more bacteria selected from the plant growth promoting bacteria group consisting of  Rhodococcus  spp.,  Pseudomonas  spp.,  Bacillus  spp., or  Xanthobacter  spp., or a mixture thereof. A closed apparatus,  FIG. 1A , containing a tri-phasic system is used to expose the bacteria to hydrocarbons, iron, cyanide, and/or ammonium compounds; the method induces the biocatalyst to biosynthesize volatile compound(s) that plant hormone production to enhance or accelerate plant development.

PARENT APPLICATION

-   Claims Benefit of Filing Date of Application: U.S. Ser. No.     14/334,392. Filed under a 37 C.F.R. §1.53(b)

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention is in the field of agricultural biotechnology. The invention generally relates to the method of exposing plant or seed to one or more bacteria that release volatile compounds, specifically to the plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) ability to enhance or accelerate the development process of plants, seedlings, or seeds.

The projected rise in global population raises concerns about the effectiveness of current agricultural techniques to meet the continuously growing demands for food, (Trostle and Seeley, 2013). Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) may be a low cost and efficient tool to increase agricultural productivity and deter post-harvest loss. PGPB have also been used as biological fertilizers, biological pesticides, and biocatalyst to prevent post-harvest loss, (Ahemad and Kibret, 2014; Bashan 1998; Pierce et al., 2011; Perry, 2011). Several species of PGPB including Azobacter, Bacillus, Azosprillum, Acetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Rhodococcus species these bacteria have been used for centuries as bacterial inoculants to modify plant development and improve nutrient uptake for plant cells, (Bashan, 1998; Vacheron et al., 2013). Ethylene production regulates plant development in climacteric fruit. Controlling ethylene concentrations can deter the plant development process and retard fruit ripening, (Binder et al., 2004; Burg, 1973; Trobacher, 2009; Victor et al., 2012; Yip and Yang, 1988; Yang and Oetiker, 1998). PGPB modify plant development by degrading ethylene, degrading ethylene precursors, and/or producing compounds that inhibit auxin production in plant cells, (Allen and Ensign, 1998; Arshad et al., 2007; DeBont and Albers, 1976; Dhungana et al., 2007; Elsgaard, 1998; Glick, 2012; Kloepper et al., 1991; Penrose and Glick, 2003). Plant growth promoting bacteria can also use dehydratase and nitrile degrading enzymes to biosynthesize cyanohydrins or auxins that manipulate the plant development process, (Egamberdieva, 2012; Hayat et al., 2010; Nomura et al., 2012; Kato et al., 2004).

A previous method to induce bacteria to delay fruit ripening was developed by Pierce et al., 2011 and U.S. patent 2013/0274, 102 (2013). Bacteria were induced to delay fruit ripening after prolonged exposure to cobalt, urea, and/or asparagine. The cell paste was immobilized on cellulose material and placed on or near fruit to delay climacteric ripening. This method was arduous and laborious; the induction process lasted for a 13-14 day period. This method would be very costly to translate into actual manufacturing and industrial applications. The multiple culture steps, expensive equipment, and expensive materials, including urea and glucose, would drive-up production cost and reduce profits.

The patentable method exposes bacteria to a single required inducer a short chained hydrocarbon, specifically ethylene and/or propylene. Secondary inducers iron and ammonium compounds enhance the bacteria production of nitrile compounds that delay fruit ripening. This method requires less media, reduced production time, and increased reproducibility of results, improving the inventions relevance for industrial and manufacturing applications. Biocatalyst exposed to inducers were able to modify the plant development process and delay the effects of fruit ripening, including changes in hue, texture, firmness, reduced presence of brown spotting, and reduced fungal infection.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In accordance with one embodiment, the new method is directed to the use of short chain hydrocarbons, including but not limited to propylene (propene) and/or ethylene to induce PGPB. The additional necessary media components include heavy metals, including but not limited to iron, and ammonium compounds to induce biocatalyst ability to modify plant development in climacteric fruit.

The PGPB are referred to as a biocatalyst comprising of one or more bacteria, particularly Rhodococcus or Norcardia spp., or a mixture thereof. The biocatalyst, comprising of PGPB include but is not limited to Acetobacter, Azobacter, Azosprillum, Bacillus, Brevibacterium, Norcardia, Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, or Xanthobacter spp. that can catalyze the hydrocarbon into volatile compounds that deter ethylene production in climacteric plants or fruit.

The present new invention method occurs wherein the biocatalyst are cultivated in a closed tri-phasic system apparatus described herein. This invention further provides an apparatus used to facilitate the induction of PGPB to produce volatile compounds required to modify the plant development process and delay ripening in climacteric plants or fruit.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

-   The invention was described above in broad terms, reference will now     address the accompanying drawing, this drawing is not necessarily     drawn to scale, and wherein:

FIG. 1A is a perspective front view of the apparatus of the past invention; the apparatus contains a tri-phasic system comprised of a solid, liquid, and gaseous phase labeled 9, 23, and 24 respectively.

FIG. 1B is a detailed operational view of the proportion indicated by the section lines 2-3 in FIG. 1, a closed system apparatus of the present invention; the apparatus contains a tri-phasic system. The biocatalyst is maintained in the solid and liquid phase of the system as defined herein below, and comprises one or more of the microorganism of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION—FIGS. 1A AND 1B—FIRST EMBODIMENT

The inventor has discovered a method to induce plant growth promoting bacteria to perform as a biocatalyst that are capable of converting short chained hydrocarbons into volatile compounds that manipulate the plant development process and delay fruit ripening. This detailed description should not be considered a means of limiting this invention to a particular embodiment. The description contains the word “comprising”, or grammatical variations of the word, it is understood to imply inclusion rather than limitations. The one or more bacteria used in the methods and apparatuses of the invention may at times be more generally referred to herein as the “biocatalyst.” The hydrocarbons are aliphatic gaseous compounds, including but not limited to propylene (propene) and/or ethylene compound or mixture thereof. The volatile compounds produced from the reaction, include but are not limited to nitriles and/or cyanohydrin mixture or combination thereof. The bacteria also uptake additional compounds released by plant cells during the induction process, including cyanide. The induction process also induces and stabilizes several enzymes found in Rhodococcus or Norcardia, including but not limited to nitrile degrading enzymes and/or monooxygenase or a combination thereof within the bacteria. The present invention is described in full detail herein after; references are made to embodiments included in this application.

Elements to monitor the efficiency of the biocatalyst can be attached to the apparatus to monitor carbon dioxide levels or pH levels in the media. Conversion of hydrocarbons to volatile compounds in a biocatalyst may comprise of additional features to permit continued circulation of air flow within the closed system. An individual skilled in the art could envision modifications for the apparatus to improve monitoring and controlling of the atmospheric conditions for the biocatalyst.

One embodiment of the closure is illustrated in FIG. 1A (front view) and FIG. 1B (detailed operational view). In particular embodiments of the invention the biocatalyst are cultivated in a closed flask container, providing a closed system. For example, as shown in FIG. 1A, the apparatus contains a tri-phasic system comprised of a solid, liquid, and gaseous phase. The solid phase (9) is comprised of 12 g of Bacto agar suspended into 300 ml of dH₂O, autoclaved and cooled in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask. However the solid phase can consist of any of a gelatinous structure, bead-like structure, and/or a matrix like structure that can support microbial cells and facilitate filamentous growth. The liquid phase (23) contains 300 ml of the induction media that consist of a heavy metal, ammonium chloride, and phosphate compounds. The gaseous headspace (24) was filled with 10-15% of hydrocarbon gas for 3-5 days at 30° C. and 120 rpm. The gaseous compounds can include ethylene and/or propylene.

Operation—First Embodiment FIG. 1B

A detailed operational view of the apparatus used for the cultivation of biocatalyst, shown in FIG. 1B. The apparatus is 2 L Erlenmeyer flask (8), apparatus could consist of any closed system container that could support a tri-phasic system. The rubber stopper (12) prevented loss of gaseous media components. The agar base (9) provides a solid surface for biofilm formation; the solid phase is an essential component to enhancing bacteria ability to modify plant development. The liquid phase (23) contains induction media necessary to induce bacteria ability to modify plant development. The gaseous headspace (24) contains hydrocarbon gas, an essential inducer to enhance bacteria ability to modify plant development.

Headspace Collection—FIG. 1B

Gaseous components are added and removed from the headspace using a two way valve (1). The open/close flow and direction of the valve is controlled by knob (2). The entry port (6) is used to attach syringes to inject gas into the system, media or gas enters the connecting tubing through the exit port (3). The 3/16 inch rubber tubing (4), is used throughout the system, the tubing is flexible and autoclavable. Cells pass quickly through the rubber tubing with little resistance or backflow. The rubber tube is connected to ⅛ silicon tube (5), silicon is rigid and necessary for constructing entry and exit point through the holes (21) in the rubber stopper. Gas enters the headspace (7).

Sample Collection—FIG. 1B

Gaseous and liquid components are added and removed through a two way valve (18). The open/close flow and direction of the valve is controlled by knob (19). The entry port (17) is used to attach syringes to inject liquid media into the system, enters the connecting tubing through the exit port (20). The 3/16 inch rubber tubing (15) is used throughout the system. The rubber passes into a 50 ml falcon tube (13) and is loosely connected to ⅛ silicon tube (14). The falcon tube (13) acts as a reservoir for over flow during cultivation, exposed openings are sealed with silicon based epoxy. The ⅛ silicon tube (14) are inserted into the stopper hole (22). A portion of the silicon tubing enters the flask (11) and connects to 3/16 inch rubber tubing (10). The rubber tubing is perforated on the ends and slightly coiled into the medium to allow for direct bubbling of gaseous components into the medium.

The present invention is generated in a closed system apparatus, comprising of a tri-phasic media condition. The tri-phasic condition consist of a solid porous base, aqueous phase, and a gaseous phase composed of a hydrocarbon and air mixture. The mechanism used for induction of the biocatalyst is not intended to be limiting by a particular enzyme, but may increase activity or expression of one or more enzymes, comprising of dehydratase, nitrile degrading enzyme, and/or monooxygenase, or a mixture thereof.

The induction of one or more of these enzymes may play a role conversion of a hydrocarbon to a volatile compound by the biocatalyst. This present invention encompasses biocatalysts that produce, or are induced to produce, or are genetically modified to produce dehydratase, nitrile degrading, and/or monooxygenase enzyme, at a quantity or at an enzymatic activity level sufficient for the conversion of short chained hydrocarbons to volatile compounds that deter ethylene production in climacteric plants or fruit. These enzymes have been studied in depth in literature based publications, possessing recognized enzymatic activities. The abundance of reference material related to the enzymes assures that such enzymes are well known to individuals skilled in the art, and the enzymes discussed in this invention can be easily produced, engineered, or purified from the biocatalyst.

The following embodiments are offered as examples, and are felt to be non-limiting and are meant to illustrate the invention but are not meant to be limiting in any way.

EXAMPLES

Rhodococcus cells were suspended in the induction media and exposed to the hydrocarbons for 3-5 days at 30° C. and 120 rpm. Biocatalyst exposed to the induction media were able to modify plant development process, and delaying ripening in climacteric plants and fruit.

TABLE 1 Induction Media M9 Stock Media (autoclaved) Na₂HPO₄—7H₂O 64 g/L KH₂PO₄ 15 g/L NaCl 2.5 g/L NH₄Cl 5.0 g/L-6.0 g/L dH₂O 1 L Working Solution M9 Media (Sterile) M9 media 200 ml 1M MgSO₄ (sterile) 2 ml 1M CaCl₂ (sterile) 100 μl Propylene and/or (10-15%) Ethylene (v/v) Cobalt or Iron 0.201 g/L Table 1: Media contained ammonium chloride and heavy metals induced bacteria to delay fruit ripening.

Fruit were collected from experiments, a Brix measurement were determined stages to validate that fruit stored with biocatalyst ripening process was delayed compared to control samples. °Brix (U) measures physiological changes, such as changes in soluble carbohydrate concentrations. Brix (U) increase and continue to increase throughout the ripening process.

TABLE 2 Brix Measurements Cobalt, Urea, Control Cobalt & Urea & Propylene Brix° Unit 15 ± 0.50 13 ± 1.5 10 ± 1.2 (% Sugar Content) Table 2: Brix° (U) measurement determines % of soluble sugars from apple samples. Apples were incubated with live biocatalyst for 12 days at 21° C. Control initial measurement ~9° (U) Brix.

Exposure to hydrocarbons induced nitrile degrading activity in Rhodococcus cells. Increased nitrile degrading activity suggests bacteria cells converted hydrocarbons into volatile compounds.

TABLE 3 Nitrile Degrading Activity Post Post Fruit Carbon Induction Exposure Source Inducers Substrate Δ(U) Δ(U) Glucose N.A. Acrylonitrile_((1 g/L))  2 ± 4.3  4 ± 0.7 *Cyanide_((0.05 g/L)) N.D. 2.0 ± 0.6 Glucose Cobalt, Acrylonitrile_((1 g/L)) 41 ± 11  55 ± 1.0 Urea *Cyanide_((0.05 g/L))  1 ± 0.0  3 ± 0.3 Propylene Propylene Acrylonitrile_((1 g/L))  27 ± 2.0  48 ± 10.5 *Cyanide_((0.05 g/L)) 1.0 ± 0.0 3.0 ± 0.3 Propylene Propylene, Acrylonitrile_((1 g/L)) 75 ± 23 96 ± 17 Cobalt, *Cyanide_((0.05 g/L)) 5.30 ± 3.0  4.0 ± 1.2 Urea Table 3: Rhodococcus rhodochrous DAP 96253 cultured in tri-phasic conditions. Nitrile degrading assay measures (U) units of activity. Units 1 uM of acrylonitrile converted to 1 uM acrylamide in 1 min, pH 7.2 at 30° C. *Units 1 uM of KCN converted to 1 uM formic acid in 1 min, pH 7.2 at 30° C. N.D. = Not Detected; N.A. = No Addition

CONCLUSION, RAMIFICATIONS, AND SCOPE

The process (method) to induce bacteria with a hydrocarbon that results in the biosynthesis of a natural nitrile compound that can delay fruit ripening can have global implications and numerous applications. While the above description contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any embodiment, but as exemplifications of the presently preferred embodiments thereof. Many other ramifications and variations are possible within the teachings of various embodiments. For example, the heavy metals used in this experiment can include iron or cobalt as secondary cofactors to enhance bacteria and enzyme yield and increase product efficacy.

-   Both metals can induce enzymatic activity to produce volatile     compounds required to delay fruit ripening, but enzyme activity     varies in the presence of iron verses the presence of cobalt.

Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, and not by the given examples.

REFERENCES

-   1. Allen, J. and S. Ensign. 1998. Identification and     characterization of epoxide carboxylase activity in cell extracts of     Nocardia coralline B276. Journal of Bacteriology, 180: 2072-2078. -   2. Ahemad, M. and M. Kibret. 2014. Mechanisms and applications of     plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal     of King Saud University-Science. 20: 1-20 -   3. Arshad, M., M. Saleem, and S. Hussain. 2007. Perspectives of     bacterial ACC deaminase in phytoremediation. Trends in Biotechnology     (Review). 25: 356-362. -   4. Barth, M., T. Hankinson, H. Zhuang, and F. Breidt. 2010.     Microbiological spoilage of fruits and vegetables, pp. 135-183.     In W. H. Sperber, M. P. Doyle (eds.), Compendium of the     Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages, 1^(st) ed. Springer     Science Press, New York, N.Y. -   5. Binder, B., R. O'Malley, W. Wang, J. Moore, B. Parks, E.     Spalding, and A. Bleecker. 2004. Arabidopsis seedling growth     response and recovery to ethylene. Plant Physiology. 136: 2913-2920. -   6. Blankenship, S. 2001. Ethylene effects and the benefits of 1-MCP.     Perishables Handling Quarterly. 108:1-4. -   7. Burg, S. 1973. Ethylene in plant growth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.     USA. 70: 591-597. -   8. Dhungana, S., R. Michalczyk, H. Boukhalfa, J. Lack, A.     Koppisch, J. Fairlee, M. Johnson, C. Ruggiero, S. John, M. Cox, C.     Browder, J. Forsythe, L. Vanderberg, M. Neu, and L. Hersmen. 2007.     Purification and characterization of rhodobactin: a mixed ligand     siderophore from Rhodococcus rhodochrous strain OFS. Biometals. 20:     853-867. -   9. De Bont, J. A. and R. A. Albers. 1976. Microbial metabolism of     ethylene. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 42:73-80 -   10. Dietz, A. and D. W. Thayer, Eds. 1980. Actinomycete taxonomy     (procedures for studying aerobic actinomycetes with emphasis on the     Streptomycetes). Society for Industrial Microbiology. 6: 28. -   11. Egamberdieva, D. 2012. Indole-acetic acid production by root     associated bacteria and its role in plant growth and development.     Chapter 7, pp. 103-122. A. H. Keller and M. D. Fallon (ed), Auxins:     Structure, Biosynthesis and Functions. 1^(st) ed., Nova Publishers,     Hauppauge, N.Y. -   12. Elsgaard, L. 1998. Ethylene removal by a biofilter with     immobilized bacteria. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 8:     4168-4173. -   13. Elsgaard, L., and L. Anderson. 1998. Microbial ethylene     consumption in peat-soil during ethylene exposure of Begonia     elatior. Plant and Soil. 202: 231-239. -   14. Elsgaard, L. 2000. Ethylene removal at low temperatures under     biofilter and batch conditions. Applied Environmental Microbiology.     66: 3878-3882. -   15. Ensign, S. and J. Allen. 2003. Aliphatic epoxide carboxylation.     Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72:55-76. -   16. Fawcett, J., and J. Scott. 1960. A rapid and precise method for     the determination of urea. J. Clin Pathol. 113: 156-159. -   17. Ganguly, S. 2005. Dissertation: Enhanced stabilization of     nitrile hydratase enzyme from Rhodococcus Species DAP 96253 and     Rhodococcus rhodochrous DAP 96622. Department of Applied and     Environmental Biology at Georgia State University. -   18. Glick, B. 2012. Plant growth promoting bacteria: Mechanism and     applications. Scientifica. 2012: 1-15. -   19. Goodfellow, M. and G. Alderson. 1977. The Actinomycete-genus     Rhodococcus: A home for the rhodochrous' complex. Journal of General     Microbiology Great Britain. 100: 99-122. -   20. Grolleaud, M. Acquired 2011 last updated 2002. Post-harvest     losses: Discovering the full story. Agriculture and Consumer     Protection Agency. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/AC301E/AC301E00.HTM -   21. Hayat, R., A. Safdar, U. Amara, R. Khalid, and I. Ahmed. 2010.     Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a     review. Annals of Microbiology. 60:579-598. -   22. Kader, A. 2005. Increasing food availability by reducing     postharvest losses of fresh produce. Acta Hort. 682: 2169-2176 -   23. Kato, Y., S. Yoshida, S. X. Xie, and Y. Asona. 2004. Aldoxime     dehydratase co-existing with nitrile hydratase and amidase in the     iron-type nitrile hydratase producing Rhodococcus sp. N-771. Journal     of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 97: 250-259 -   24. Kloepper, J., R. Zablotowicz, E. Tipping, and R. Lifshitz. 1991.     Promoting growth promotion mediated by bacterial rhizosphere     colonizers. Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research. 14:     315-326. -   25. Kobayashi, M., N. Yanaka, T. Nagasawa, and H. Yamada. 1992.     Primary structure of an aliphatic nitrile degrading enzyme,     aliphatic nitrilase, from Rhodococcus rhodochrous K22 and expression     of its gene and identification of its active site residue.     Biochemistry. 31: 9000-9007. -   26. Lambert, J., J. Ramasamy, and J. Paukstelis. 1975. Stable     reagents for the colorimetric determination of cyanide by modified     Konig reactions. Anal Chem 47: 916-918. -   27. Moretti, C., A. Araujo, W. A. Marouelli, and W. Silva. 2002.     1-Methylcyclopropene delays tomato fruit ripening. Horticultura     Brasileira. 20: 659-663. -   28. Nagasawa, T., M. Wieser, T. Nakamura, H. Iwahara, T. Yoshida, K.     Gekko. 2000. Nitrilase of Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1; Conversion     into active form by subunit association. Eur. J. Biochemistry. 267:     138-144. -   29. Nomura, J., H. Hashimoto, T. Ohta, Y. Hashimoto, K. Wada, Y.     Naruta, K. I. Oinuma, and M. Kobayashi. 2012. Crystal structure of     aldoxime dehydratase and its catalytic mechanism involved in     carbon-nitrogen triple-bond synthesis. PNAS Early Edition. Pp 1-6. -   30. Penrose, D. and B. Glick. 2003. Methods for isolating and     characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting     rhizobacteria. Physiologia Plantarum. 118: 10-15. -   31. Perry, G. D. 2011. Enhancing the Expression of Enzymes Used to     Degrade Hydrocarbons and Cyanohydrins in Rhodococcus sp. DAP 96253     by Using Inducers such as Cobalt, Urea, and Propylene Gas; Also     Enhances the Ability of the Bacteria to Delay the Ripening of     Several Fruit Species. Biology Dissertations. 102: 19-21. -   32. Perry, G. D. 2014. Ethylene induced soil microbes to increase     seed germination, reduce growth time, and improve crop yield in     Pisum sativum L. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e543v1     https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.543v1 -   33. Pierce, G., G. Drago, S. Ganguly, T. Tucker, S. Jones, and S.     Crow. 2011. Preliminary report on a catalyst derived from induced     cells of Rhodococcus rhodochrous strain DAP 96253 that delays the     ripening of selected climacteric fruit: bananas, avocados, and     peaches. Journal of Industrial Microbiology Biotechnology. 38:     1567-1573. -   34. Pierce, E., S. Ganguly-Mink, and G. Drago. 2013.     Biological-based catalyst to delay plant development process. US     Patent Application Number: 2013/0274,102. -   35. Rasori, A., B. Ruperti, C. Bonghi, P. Tonutti, and A.     Ramina. 2002. Characterization of two putative ethylene receptor     genes expressed during peach fruit development and abscission.     Journal of Experimental Botany. 53:2333-23339. -   36. Singh, R., and U. Dwivedi. 2008. Effect of Ethrel and     1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on antioxidants in mango     (Mangiferaindica var. Dashehari) during fruit ripening. Food     Chemistry. 111: 951-956. -   37. Sisler, E., M. Serek, K. Roh, R. Goren. 2001. The effect of     chemical structure on the antagonism by cyclopropenes of ethylene     responses in banana. Plant Growth Regulation, 33: 107-110. -   38. Trobacher, C. 2009. Ethylene and programmed cell death in     plants. Botany. 87:757-769. -   39. Trostle, R. and R. Seeley. 2013. Developing countries world     demand for agriculture. USDA Economic Research Service.     http---www_ers_usda_gov-amber-waves-2013-august-developing-countries-dominate-world-demand-for-agricultural     products_aspx%23_U5kfm6F8ohx_pdfmyurl.pdf -   40. Vacheron, J., G. Desbrosses, M. Bouffaud, B. Touraine, Y.     Moenne-Loccoz, D. Mueller, and C. Prigent-Combaret. 2013. Plant     growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front.     Plant Sci. 17; 1-19. -   41. Victorio, C., C. Salgueiro, and A. Sato. 2012. Tissue culture     techniques in the proliferation of shoots and roots of Calendula     officinalis. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 43: 539-545. -   42. Yang, S. and J. Oetiker. 1998. Molecular biology of ethylene     biosynthesis and its application in horticulture. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort.     Sci. 67:1209-1214. -   43. Yip, W. K. and S. Yang. 1988. Cyanide metabolism in relation to     ethylene production in plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 88:473-476. 

1. A method for inducing bacteria in a tri-phasic condition to biosynthesize volatile compounds that result in the enhanced and/or accelerated growth of a seed, seedling, or plant, wherein the method comprises of exposing seed, seedling, or plant to exogenous volatiles released by one or more bacteria, wherein the biosynthesis of volatile compounds is induced by exposure of the bacteria to inducing agents including short chained hydrocarbon comprising propylene and/or ethylene, and optionally a nitrogen compound comprising urea, ammonium sulfate, or cyanide, and mixtures thereof, and wherein one or more bacteria produce enough said volatile compounds upon exposure to the seed, seedling, or plant to enhanced and/or accelerated growth.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more bacteria are selected from a group consisting of Rhodococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., and Xanthobacter spp.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more bacteria are induced by exposure to a short chained hydrocarbon, iron, cyanide, and/or ammonium compound.
 4. The method of claim 4, wherein the short chained hydrocarbon consisting of ethylene and/or propylene (propene).
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the volatile compound produced by the one or more bacteria includes an aliphatic nitrile, ethylene cyanohydrin, and/or propylene cyanohydrin or mixture thereof.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the seed, seedling, or plant is directly or indirectly exposed to the nitrile compound produced by the one or more bacteria.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more bacteria are suspended in an aqueous solution and mixed within solid matter are placed in, placed on, or placed below a seed, seedling, or plant during the early stages of plant development.
 8. A method for modulating plant hormone levels in plant cells during early stage development which comprises of exposing a seed, seedling, or plant to exogenous volatile compound(s) biosynthesized by enzymatic extract of one or more bacteria, wherein said volatiles are biosynthesized upon bacteria exposure in tri-phasic condition to inducing agents comprising short chained hydrocarbons including propylene and/or ethylene, and optionally a nitrogen compound comprising urea, ammonium sulfate, or cyanide, and mixtures thereof, and wherein the extract of said bacteria produce enough said volatile compounds upon exposure to the seed, seedling, or plant to enhance and/or accelerate plant development. 